<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Question of Sausage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/</link>
	<description>Nefarious Designs is the web development agency and blog of Tim Huegdon, a web developer with over 5 years experience in the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alin M</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-85441</link>
		<dc:creator>Alin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-85441</guid>
		<description>Words like that are called &quot;uncountable nouns&quot; -- or at least that&#039;s what they told me when I was learning English. Food, fruit and money are in the same category. What I find interesting is that here in the US one can hear &quot;foods&quot; or &quot;fruits&quot; but never &quot;monies.&quot; Why is that? Money is actually &quot;more&quot; countable than food and fruit :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words like that are called &#8220;uncountable nouns&#8221; &#8212; or at least that&#8217;s what they told me when I was learning English. Food, fruit and money are in the same category. What I find interesting is that here in the US one can hear &#8220;foods&#8221; or &#8220;fruits&#8221; but never &#8220;monies.&#8221; Why is that? Money is actually &#8220;more&#8221; countable than food and fruit <img src='http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soldinio</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-8337</link>
		<dc:creator>soldinio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-8337</guid>
		<description>The plural of a sausage is two sausages.
The plural of sausage, is sausage meats

But what is the plural of &quot;chaos&quot; ?

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plural of a sausage is two sausages.<br />
The plural of sausage, is sausage meats</p>
<p>But what is the plural of &#8220;chaos&#8221; ?</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrissy T</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-7844</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrissy T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-7844</guid>
		<description>The following could also work:

Last night, I had 4 minges with my sausage. I couldâ€™ve eaten another minge, but then I would have eaten A LOT of minge.

Completely hypothetical of course. Isn&#039;t minge a funny word?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following could also work:</p>
<p>Last night, I had 4 minges with my sausage. I couldâ€™ve eaten another minge, but then I would have eaten A LOT of minge.</p>
<p>Completely hypothetical of course. Isn&#8217;t minge a funny word?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayo Bethlehem</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-4631</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayo Bethlehem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 08:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-4631</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m now hungry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-4570</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-4570</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ Hayo:&lt;/strong&gt; Good call... Oh wait, but the same couldn&#039;t be said if you substitute &quot;sausage&quot; with something else; like &quot;apple&quot; for instance:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Last night, I had 4 apples with my mash. I couldâ€™ve eaten another apple, but then I would have eaten A LOT of apple.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It still works -- grammatically &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; culinarily (that isn&#039;t a word, is it?)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ Hayo:</strong> Good call&#8230; Oh wait, but the same couldn&#8217;t be said if you substitute &#8220;sausage&#8221; with something else; like &#8220;apple&#8221; for instance:</p>
<blockquote><p>Last night, I had 4 apples with my mash. I couldâ€™ve eaten another apple, but then I would have eaten A LOT of apple.</p></blockquote>
<p>It still works &#8212; grammatically <em>and</em> culinarily (that isn&#8217;t a word, is it?)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayo Bethlehem</title>
		<link>http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/comment-page-1/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayo Bethlehem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2006/10/a-question-of-sausage/#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>&quot;sausage&quot; seems to be the container reference to the goo inside the skin. So in that sense, i guess sausage and sausages are both correct;  sausage referring to a heap of goo, and sausages more referring to the type of container.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;sausage&#8221; seems to be the container reference to the goo inside the skin. So in that sense, i guess sausage and sausages are both correct;  sausage referring to a heap of goo, and sausages more referring to the type of container.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

